El rol de las universidades en la creación de ciudades inteligentes
The role of universities in the creation of smart cities
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El contenido de la revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional - (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Bajo los siguientes términos:
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
SinDerivadas — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuir el material modificado.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El concepto de la ciudad inteligente se ha consolidado como un referente en la planificación urbana, especialmente en la gobernanza, que trasciende el uso de la tecnología al incorporar factores contextuales y la participación de diversos actores para identificar retos y diseñar estrategias. Desde la gobernanza de la ciudad inteligente, las universidades se posicionan como actores clave que dinamizan las agendas urbanas de desarrollo. Este documento analiza el rol de la universidad en la construcción de la ciudad inteligente, tomando como estudio de caso a la ciudad de Medellín (Colombia). La investigación, con enfoque cualitativo y alcance descriptivo, utilizó entrevistas semiestructuradas y análisis documental. Los resultados evidencian seis roles desempeñados por las universidades; dos se identifican como aportes propios de esta investigación: i) la universidad que participa en espacios de toma de decisiones y; ii) la universidad que facilita infraestructura. Los otros cuatro coinciden con los descritos en la literatura: iii) formación en temas de la ciudad inteligente; iv) generación y transferencia de conocimiento; v) consultoría y ejecución de proyectos y; vi) fomento del emprendimiento. Finalmente, se concluye que las universidades contribuyen activamente a la sociedad, articulando actores y participando en instancias de decisión para fortalecer la inteligencia colectiva en las ciudades.
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Aïdi, N. & Fabry, N. (2024). Beyond the certification of smart tourism destination: Insights from the city of Medellín in Colombia. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 10(2), 577-603. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-03-2022-0056
Albino, V., Berardi, U. & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
Alcaldía de Medellín y Área Metropolitana del Valle de Aburrá. (2019). Metrópoli 2050. La superciudad de Medellín. https://www.medellin.gov.co/irj/go/km/docs/pccdesign/medellin/Temas/PlaneacionMunicipal/Publicaciones/Shared%20Content/Documentos/2020/Libro_Metropoli_2050.pdf
Alcaldía de Medellín. (2024). Medellín creemos en vos, anteproyecto. Plan de desarrollo 2024-2027. https://www.medellin.gov.co/es/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Anteproyecto_Plan_Desarrollo_2024_2027_29022024.pdf
Ardito, L., Ferraris, A., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Bresciani, S. & Del Giudice, M. (2019). The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 312-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.030
Arup, TalTech, Climate-KIC. & UNDP. (2024). Smarter and inclusive cities. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-06/smarterandinclusivecitiescourse_2.pdf
Bălășescu, S., Neacșu, N. A., Madar, A., Zamfirache, A. & Bălășescu, M. (2022). Research of the smart city concept in Romanian cities. Sustainability, 14(16), 10004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610004
Barrutia, J. M., Echebarria, C., Aguado-Moralejo, I., Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. & Hartmann, P. (2022). Leading smart city projects: Government dynamic capabilities and public value creation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121679
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G. & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal: Special Topics, 214, 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Beckers, D., Gerli, P., Mora, L., Thabit, S. & Tonnarelli, F. (2022). Global review of smart city governance practices. UN-Habitat. https://unhabitat.org/global-review-of-smart-city-governance-practices
Beckers, D., Gerli, P., Mora, L., Thabit, S. & Tonnarelli, F. (2023). Managing smart city governance - A playbook for local and regional governments. UN-Habitat. https://unhabitat.org/managing-smart-city-governance-a-playbook-for-local-and-regional-governments
Belyaeva, Z. (2015). Entrepreneurial innovation and stakeholder relationship management. In Kaufmann, H. R. & Shams, S. M. (Eds.), Entrepreneurial Challenges in the 21st Century (pp. 120-132). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137479761_8
Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301
Brayda, W. C. & Boyce, T. D. (2014). So you really want to interview me?: Navigating “sensitive” qualitative research interviewing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 318-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300115
Breakthrough. (2023). Antioquia emergente. https://estrategiaemergente.com/antioquia-emergente
Caragliu, A., C., Del Bo., C. & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
Carayannis, E. G. & Campbell, D. F. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G. & Savoldelli, A. (2016). Smart cities governance: The need for a holistic approach to assessing urban participatory policy making. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), 724-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611103
Centro de Ciencia y Tecnología de Antioquia. (2021). Hojas de ruta para el fortalecimiento del ecosistema de CTeI desde la perspectiva de misiones transformativas para una Medellín sostenible e inteligente en 2030. https://cta.org.co/biblionet/hojas-de-ruta-para-el-fortalecimiento-del-ecosistema-ctei/
Concejo de Medellín. (2023). Acuerdo 078 de 2023. Por medio del cual se adopta e integra la Política Distrital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación para la sostenibilidad del Distrito Especial de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Medellín. https://www.medellin.gov.co/es/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/130_acuerdo_078_2023_sancionado-1.pdf
Congreso de Colombia. (2017). Ley 1838 de 2017. Por la cual se dictan normas de fomento a la ciencia, tecnología e innovación mediante la creación de empresas de base tecnológica (spin-offs). https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/reglamentacion/ley1838-2017.pdf
Congreso de Colombia (2023). Ley 2286 de 2023. Por medio de la cual se dictan las disposiciones para el Distrito especial de Ciencia, Tecnología e innovación de Medellín. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_2286_2023.html
Corporación Universitaria Lasallista. (2020). Plan de desarrollo de la ULS 2020-2025. Posicionamiento institucional. https://www.unilasallista.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Plan-de-desarrollo-2025.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L. & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390
Cukier, D. & Kon, F. (2018). A maturity model for software startup ecosystems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(14). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0091-6
Dai, Y., Hasanefendic, S. & Bossink, B. (2024). A systematic literature review of the smart city transformation process: The role and interaction of stakeholders and technology. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105112
Del-Real, C., Ward, C. & Sartipi, M. (2023). What do people want in a smart city? Exploring the stakeholders’ opinions, priorities and perceived barriers in a medium-sized city in the United States. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(S1), 50-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1968939
Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Dicicco-bloom, B. & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G. & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Chapter 6: opening platforms: How, when and why? In A. Gawer. Plataforms, markers and innovation. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803311.00013
Esposito, G., Clement, J., Mora, L. & Crutzen, N. (2021). One size does not fit all: Framing smart city policy narratives within regional socio-economic contexts in Brussels and Wallonia. Cities, 118, 103329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103329
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Ferraris, A., Belyaeva, Z. & Bresciani, S. (2020). The role of universities in the smart city innovation: Multistakeholder integration and engagement perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 119, 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.010
Franco, M. & Haase, H. (2017). Success factors in university sport partnerships: A case study. EuroMed Journal of Business, 12(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-04-2016-0011
Franz, T. (2017). Urban governance and economic development in Medellín: An “urban miracle”? Latin American Perspectives, 44(2), 52-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X16668313
Gao, K. & Yuan, Y. (2022). Is the sky of smart city bluer? Evidence from satellite monitoring data. Journal of Environmental Management, 317, 115483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115483
Gibbert, M. & Ruigrok, W. (2010). The “what” and “how” of case study rigor: Three strategies based on published work. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 710-737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109351319
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R. Pichler-Milanovic, N. & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261367640_Smart_cities_-_Ranking_of_European_medium-sized_cities
Gobernación de Antioquia. (2024). Anteproyecto plan de desarrollo, por Antioquia firme 2024-2027. https://antioquia.gov.co/images/PDF2/plan-de-desarrollo/2024/240229-anteproyecto-revisado-1.pdf
González-Pérez, M. A., Mohieldin, M., Hult, G. T. & Vélez-Ocampo, J. (2021). COVID-19, sustainable development challenges of Latin America and the Caribbean, and the potential engines for an SDGs-based recovery. Management Research: The journal of the Iberoamerican academy of management, 19(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2020-1119
Guenduez, A. A., Frischknecht, R., Frowein, S. C. J. & Schedler, K. (2024a). Government-university collaboration on smart city and smart government projects: What are the success factors? Cities, 144, 104648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104648
Guenduez, A. A., Mergel, I., Schedler, K., Fuchs, S. & Douillet, C. (2024b). Institutional work in smart cities: Interviews with smart city managers. Urban Governance, 4(1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2024.01.003
Hollands, R. G. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011
Huertas, J. I., Mahlknecht, J., Lozoya-Santos, J. D. J., Uribe, S., López-Guajardo, E. A. & Ramírez-Mendoza, R. A. (2021). Campus city project: Challenge living lab for smart cities. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11085. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311085
Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano. (2022). Plan de desarrollo 2022-2025: hacia una era de Universidad y Humanidad. https://www.itm.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/legales/2025/Plan-de-Desarrollo-Universidad-Humanidad-2022-2025-v-dic2024_compressed.pdf
International Institute for Management Development. (2025). IMD smart city index 2025. The housing affordability challenge: A growing concern. https://imd.widen.net/s/psdrsvpbk7/imd_smart_city_2025_report
Irazábal, C. & Jirón, P. (2021). Latin American smart cities: Between worlding infatuation and crawling provincialising. Urban Studies, 58(3), 507-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020945201
Ivars-Baidal, J. A., Vera-Rebollo, J. F., Perles-Ribes, J., Femenia-Serra, F. & Celdrán-Bernabeu, M. A. (2023). Sustainable tourism indicators: What’s new within the smart city/destination approach? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(7), 1556-1582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1876075
Janowski, T., Estevez, E. & Baguma, R. (2018). Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizen-administration relationships in the digital age. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S1-S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.002
Jiang, H. (2021). Smart urban governance in the ‘smart’ era: Why is it urgently needed? Cities, 111, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103004
Jiang, H., Geertman, S. & Witte, P. (2020). A sociotechnical framework for smart urban governance: Urban technological innovation and urban governance in the realm of Smart Cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 9(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2020010101
Jiang, H., Geertman, S. & Witte, P. (2022). Smart urban governance: An alternative to technocratic “smartness”. GeoJournal, 87, 1639-1655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w
Jurado-Zambrano, D. A., Vélez-Ocampo, J. y López-Zapata, E. (2023). Smart governance strategies and their relationships with SDGs in three Latin American cities. Management Research: The journal of the Iberoamerican academy of management, 21(1), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-01-2022-1270
Kaginalkar, A., Kumar, S., Gargava, P. & Niyogi, D. (2023). Stakeholder analysis for designing an urban air quality data governance ecosystem in smart cities. Urban Climate, 48, 101403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101403
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M. & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
Kitchin, R. (2022). Conceptualising smart cities. Urban Research & Practice, 15(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2022.2031143
Kourtit, K. & Nijkamp, P. (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 93-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660331
Letaifa, S. B. (2015). How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1414-1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.024
Locke, K., Feldman, M. & Golden-Biddle, K. (2022). Coding practices and iterativity: Beyond templates for analyzing qualitative data. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 262-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120948600
Luna-Reyes, L. F., Black, L. J., Cresswell, A. M. & Pardo, T. A. (2008). Knowledge sharing and trust in collaborative requirements analysis. System Dynamics Review, 24(3), 265-297. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.404
Marginson, S. (2007). University mission and identity for a post post-public era. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360601166851
Martínez-Acosta, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., Mejía-Manzano, L. A., Soto-Inzunza, G. V., Ruiz-Aguilar, K. M., Kuhn Cuellar, L., Caratozzolo, P. & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2023). The implementation of SDG12 in and from higher education institutions: Universities as laboratories for generating sustainable cities. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5, 1158464. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.1158464
Meijer, A. & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. y Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mora, L., Gerli, P., Ardito, L. & Messeni, A. (2023). Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda. Technovation, 123, 102717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717
Morozov, E. & Bria, F. (2018). Rethinking the smart city: Democratizing urban technology. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. https://rosalux.nyc/rethinking-the-smart-city/
Morrow, S. L. & Smith, M. L. (2000). Qualitative research for counseling psychology. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of Counseling Psychology (pp. 199-230). John Wiley & Sons.
Myers, M. D. & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001
Newman, J., Cherney, A. & Head, B. W. (2016). Do policy makers use academic research? Reexamining the “two communities” theory of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12464
Paes, V. C., Pessoa, C. H., Pagliusi, R. P., Barbosa, C. E., Argôlo, M., de Lima, Y. O., Salazar, H., Lyra, A. & de Souza, J. M. (2023). Analyzing the challenges for future smart and sustainable cities. Sustainability, 15(10), 7996. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107996
Palomo-Navarro, Á. & Navío-Marco, J. (2018). Smart city networks’ governance: The Spanish smart city network case study. Telecommunications Policy, 42(10), 872-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.10.002
Park, J. & Yoo, S. (2023). Evolution of the smart city: Three extensions to governance, sustainability, and decent urbanisation from an ICT-based urban solution. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(sup. 1), 10-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2110143
Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E. & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review. Information Polity, 23(2), 143-162. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3233/IP-170067
Pierre, J. (1999). Models of urban governance: The institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 372-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(11), 1451-1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004
Powers, J. B. & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.008
Proantioquia. (2024). Recomendaciones de Proantioquia para la construcción del plan de desarrollo de Medellín 2024-2027. https://proantioquia.org.co/download/recomendaciones-de-proantioquia-para-la-construccion-del-plan-de-desarrollo-de-antioquia-2024-2027/
Przeybilovicz, E. & Cunha, M. A. (2024). Governing in the digital age: The emergence of dynamic smart urban governance modes. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101907
Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M. A., Geertman, S., Leleux, C., Michels, A., Tomor, Z., Webster, C. W. & Meijer, A. (2022). Citizen participation in the smart city: Findings from an international comparative study. Local Government Studies, 48(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1851204
Ramos, M. E. (2021). Medellín, ciudad innovadora: logros y retos para aportar a una política de desarrollo productivo nacional. Fundación Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/kolumbien/18408.pdf
Rana, N. P., Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., Islam, R., Roderick, S. & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Barriers to the development of smart cities in Indian context. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 503-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9873-4
Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focussed stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9573-3
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D. & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm023
Royall, E. (2024). Smart cities centering people: A playbook for local and regional governments. https://unhabitat.org/programme/legacy/people-centered-smart-cities/centering-people-in-smart-cities
Ruhlandt, R. W. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014
Solarino, A. M. & Aguinis, H. (2021). Challenges and best-practice recommendations for designing and conducting interviews with elite informants. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 649-672. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12620
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Steinmo, M. & Rasmussen, E. (2018). The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier. Research Policy, 47(10), 1964-1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.004
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 68(227-228), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12189
Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583
Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. W. W. Norton & Company.
Trencher, G. (2019). Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033
Universidad CES. (2020). Plan estratégico de desarrollo 2020-2025: es la carta de navegación para avanzar hacia la excelencia. https://www.ces.edu.co/noticia/plan-estrategico-de-desarrollo-2020-2025-es-la-carta-de-navegacion-para-avanzar-hacia-la-excelencia/
Universidad de Antioquia. (2017). Plan de desarrollo 2017-2026. Una construcción colectiva de la comunidad universitaria. https://www.udea.edu.co/wps/wcm/connect/udea/953ceff4-abe4-409f-abdf-77f9b2aa5db0/PDI+UdeA+2017-2026+05-05-17+para+CSU.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Universidad de Medellín. (2021). Plan de desarrollo UdeMedellín 2021-2025. https://udemedellin.edu.co/plan-de-desarrollo-udemedellin-2021-2025/
Universidad de Navarra. (2025). Índice IESE cities in motion 2025. IESE Business School. https://www.iese.edu/media/research/pdfs/ST-0665
Universidad EAFIT. (s.f.). Itinerario EAFIT 2030: Plan de Desarrollo Institucional. https://www.eafit.edu.co/institucional/info-general/Paginas/plan-estrategico-desarrollo.aspx
Universidad EIA. (2023). Proyecto institucional. https://www.eia.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Proyecto-Institucional-PI-web.pdf
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Medellín. (2022). Plan de acción 2022-2024. https://medellin.unal.edu.co/images/institucional/documentos/Plan_de_Accin_2022-2024_V5.pdf
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. (2017). Plan de desarrollo institucional - PDI - UPB innovadora y sostenible 2017-2025. https://www.upb.edu.co/es/colegio/Plan-de-Desarrollo-Institucional/DOC_PlanDeDesarrolloInstitucional_COL.pdf
Vélez-Ocampo, J. & González-Pérez, M. A. (2022). Internationalization and capability building in emerging markets: What comes after success? European Management Review, 19(3), 370-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12487
Verhulst, S. G. (2018). Where and when AI and CI meet: Exploring the intersection of artificial and collective intelligence towards the goal of innovating how we govern. AI & Society, 33, 293-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0830-z
Villegas-Ch, W., Palacios-Pacheco, X. & Luján-Mora, S. (2019). Application of a smart city model to a traditional university campus with a big data architecture: A sustainable smart campus. Sustainability, 11(10), 2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102857
Vissak, T. (2010). Recommendations for using the case study method in international business research. The Qualitative Report, 15(2), 370-388. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol15/iss2/8/
Welch, C. & Piekkari, R. (2017). How should we (not) judge the ‘quality’ of qualitative research? A re-assessment of current evaluative criteria in international business. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 714-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.007
Woods, O. (2020). Subverting the logics of “smartness” in Singapore: Smart eldercare and parallel regimes of sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101940
Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392599
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zawieska, J. & Pieriegud, J. (2018). Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonisation. Transport Policy, 63, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.11.004
Zhao, F., Fashola, O. I., Olarewaju, T. I. & Onwumere, I. (2021). Smart city research: A holistic and state-of-the-art literature review. Cities, 119, 103406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103406
Descargas
Datos de publicación
Declaraciones de autoría
- Editor y equipo editorial
- Perfiles
- Sociedad académica
- Universidad Ean
- Editorial
- Universidad Ean
Para obtener más información sobre un dato, haga clic 
Public Facts Label - Plugin Mantenido por Public Knowledge Project
